I debated all week whether to write about tech news and China today, per usual, or share something more personally and philosophical, given the violence against Asian Americans that reached a new height last week with what happened in Atlanta.

I decided on the latter. I’m sorry if that disappoints you. Obviously, there are many big news items in the tech and US-China world -- high-level bilateral meetings in Alaska, Tesla being restricted from Chinese government and military employees, to name just a few. My thoughts on all that can wait.

I’ve been pondering on a notion that I’m calling the “lived experience quotient.” Basically, what it describes is the amount of information and opinion that is based on the lived experience of the person doing the sharing. You can apply it to anything you read, watch, and hear.

This “quotient” is critically important to our learning and understanding of...everything! Living in a time when information production and dissemination is easier and cheaper than ever before, from where and whom to learn from has become the new challenge. The way I make this judgement is by assessing the “lived experience quotient” of the information source.

I try to keep the “lived experience quotient” high in every Interconnected post as well. That’s why the three most popular topic tags on this newsletter are “open source”, “China”, and “cloud industry.” The intersection of these three topics is where my lived experience was and is. If I do bring in my perspectives on regulations and government policies into the mix, they are drawn from where I personally worked (the White House, the Department of Commerce) and my function (media and communications).

You should never come here to learn about the latest consumer tech trends in China; for that, go to Rui Ma’s Tech Buzz China. You should never come here to learn about the profitability, margins, and CapEx implications of the semiconductor industry; for that, go to Mule’s newsletter. When I do write about the semiconductor industry, it’s usually from a more macro and interdisciplinary angle, where I think my own lived experiences are relevant.

It’s hard to be disciplined though. I sometimes slip, because opining is easy, listening and learning is hard; commenting is easy, researching and analyzing is hard. This isn’t to say people with less lived experience cannot share their opinion, just that they should do more question-asking and listening.

I caught myself slipping this past week after the massacre in Atlanta happened. I wrote several tweets voicing my anger, dismay, and frustration. Even though I am an Asian American and can certainly speak to the rise in anti-Asian violence from that lived experience, the focal point of this tragedy is the victimization of Asian women -- a perspective for which I have no lived experience.

So instead of commenting on this tragedy more, I would just leave you with the names of all the victims and a video put together by the Asian American Journalists Association on the proper way to pronounce the names of the ethnic Korean and Chinese victims.

If I ever write about other topics on Interconnected, it will be because my own horizons and lived experiences have expanded. That’s my commitment to you.

As we all continue our knowledge-seeking (dare I say, truth-seeking) journey, I hope you find voices and sources of information that draw from lived experiences. Meanwhile, be aware of information that may cater to your existing assumptions (thus easy on the eyes and brain), but aren’t based on anything other than second or third-hand information, packaged as “insight”.

In short, look for the organic food, where the “lived experience quotient” is highest, and try to stay away from the processed stuff.

Not all opinions are created equal. Not all lived experiences are created equal. It’s worthwhile to figure out the difference.

Kevin

If you like what you've read, please SUBSCRIBE to the Interconnected email list. To read all previous posts, please check out the Archive section. New content will be delivered to your inbox (twice per week). Follow and interact with me on: Twitter, LinkedIn, Clubhouse (@kevinsxu).

生活经验指数

我犹豫纠结了一周,是照常些于科技和中国有关的新闻评论,还是鉴于上周在亚特兰大发生的针对亚裔的暴力事件,写一点“心窝里”的话。

我最终决定选择后者。如果这让您失望了,我很抱歉。虽然,科技界和中美之间的大新闻源源不断,比如在阿拉斯加举行的高级别双边会议,以及特斯拉限制不许被中国政府和军方员工使用。我对这些事情的看法都可以等。

我一直在思考一个概念,我先称之为 "生活经验指数"。基本意思就是,衡量信息和观点背后是基于多少分享者个人的生活经验的指数。可以用于任何您读到的、看到的和听到的东西。

这个 "指数" 对我们学习和理解基本上所有事情都很重要。大家都生活在一个信息产出和传播比以往任何时候都更容易、更廉价的时代。从哪里学、向谁学成为了新的挑战。我在筛选信息来源时做出判断的方式就是评估来源本身的 "生活经验商数"。

我的每一篇《互联》文章中,也在尽量保持较高的 "生活经验商数"。这也是为什么本博客上文章最多的三个话题标签是 "开源"、"中国" 和 "云行业"。这三个话题的交界点,就是我过去和目前的“生活应验”。如果我把一些关于监管法规和政府政策的观点带入文章中,那也是基于我个人亲身工作了的地方(白宫、商务部)和我的工作内容(媒体和信息传播)。

您绝不应该来这里了解中国最新的to C科技趋势;要想了解,应去读马睿的Tech Buzz China。您绝对不应该来这里了解半导体厂家的盈利能力、利润率和资本开支的影响;要想了解,应去的分析师Mule写的博客。如果我写关于半导体行业的话题,也是从一个更宏观和多元的角度,把自己有的相关的生活经验带入文章。

不过在这一点要把控自己,做到自律很难。我有时会犯错误,因为发表意见很容易,倾听和学习很难;分享评论很容易,认真研究和分析很难。这并不是说生活经验较少的人不许发表自己的意见,只是应该做更多的提问和倾听。

在亚特兰大的这场屠杀发生后,我发觉自己开始犯错误了。我写了几条推特,发泄了我的愤怒、失望和沮丧。尽管我是一个亚裔美国人,当然可以从我的生活经验谈论反亚裔暴力事件的上升这个大问题,但这场悲剧的焦点是亚裔妇女受害。在这一点上我没有生活经验。

因此,我也不想对这一悲剧作更多的评论,只想给大家留下所有受害者的姓名,以及“亚裔美国记者协会”制作的视频,教大家所有韩裔和华裔受害者姓名的正确发音。

如果今后我在《互联》上开始写其他话题,那是源于我自己的视野和生活经验在扩大。这是我对读者的承诺。

当我们继续自己的求知(甚至可以说,求真)之旅时,希望您能找到可靠的声音和信息来源,基于扎实的生活经验。同时,要对那些 "包装过的信息" 保持警惕,它们可能会迎合您当前的喜好和设想(因此对眼睛和大脑都更“舒服”些),但都是第二或第三手信息被包装成的所谓 "专家见解"。

简而言之,多吃点 "生活体验指数" 高的有机食品,尽量远离“加工食品”。

不是所有的意见评论都是一样的。不是所有的生活经验都是一样的。值得我们大家去弄清楚其中的区别。

Kevin

如果您喜欢所读的内容,请用email订阅加入“互联”。要想读以前的文章,请查阅《互联档案》。每周两次,新的文章将会直接送达您的邮箱。请在TwitterLinkedIn、Clubhouse(@kevinsxu)上给个follow,和我交流互动!